This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
U.S. Supreme Court

Aug. 28, 2023

SCOTUS poised to resolve circuit split on SOX federal whistleblower standard and other statutes

See more on SCOTUS poised to resolve circuit split on SOX federal whistleblower standard and other statutes

While some may expect this Supreme Court to affirm the Second Circuit’s unanimous ruling, statutory-interpretation cases in the employment context have at times defied expectations. Regardless, employers should continue proceeding with caution when deciding whether to take adverse employment action against an employee who has or may have engaged in protected activity.

Cooper Spinelli

Associate
Morrison Foerster's Global Employment and Labor Group

Cooper J. Spinelli is an associate with Morrison Foerster's Global Employment and Labor Group. Prior to MoFo, Cooper worked as an attorney-advisor at the Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges, which adjudicates complaints arising from over 80 labor-related federal statutes, including whistleblower complaints under SOX, Dodd-Frank, the Federal Rail Safety Act, and the Affordable Care Act.

See more...

Eric Akira Tate

Partner
Morrison Foerster's Global Employment and Labor Group

Eric Akira Tate is partner and co-chair of the firm's Global Employment and Labor Group where he represents technology and other companies in bet-the-company trade secrets and employee mobility cases.

See more...

The California Supreme Court recently confirmed that retaliatory intent is required to state a claim under California's general whistleblower statute. Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 12 Cal. 5th 703, 715 (2022).

Now, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide next term the answer to a similar question under the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up