Intellectual Property
Feb. 14, 2024
Masimo accuses Apple of delay tactics in patent infringement case
Masimo Corp.’s lawyers have accused Apple Inc. of using a delay tactic to oppose a motion to lift a nearly four-year stay on Masimo’s claims in a patent infringement case. Apple’s counsel argued that Masimo’s motion to lift the stay would be premature.
Lawyers for Masimo Corp. in a pulse oximetry patent infringement case argued that Apple’s opposition to a motion to lift a nearly four-year stay on Masimo’s claims was nothing more than a delay tactic.
In early February, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP partner Mark D. Selwyn for Apple Inc. wrote in an opposition that Masimo’s motion to lift the stay would be premature. The reason, Selwyn said, is that Apple intends to challenge “...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In