Labor/Employment,
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb. 20, 2024
Uber plaintiffs urge Supreme Court not to reenter PAGA dispute
“Uber’s gripe is that the decision does not relieve Uber of the obligation to defend against those claims altogether,” Nicolas A. Sansone, an attorney with Public Citizen Litigation Group, wrote.
Lawyers for a former Uber Technologies Inc. driver have urged the U.S. Supreme Court not to review a California state appellate ruling that allowed a plaintiff’s claims on behalf of other workers under the Private Attorney Generals Act to be decided in court.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP partner Theane D. Evangelis, who represents Uber in a writ of certiorari filed in December, asked the Supreme Court to reject what she described as a “P...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In