This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Civil Rights,
Litigation & Arbitration

Mar. 7, 2024

San Francisco ballot measures facing challenges, litigation uncertain

Opponents said they would monitor implementation of Measure F, which requires drug screening for adults seeking city welfare benefits, and Measure E, which allows the police to use drones, surveillance cameras and facial recognition technology in combating crime.

Opponents of two ballot measures passed by San Francisco voters declined to say Wednesday whether they will pursue litigation to overturn the new ordinances but vowed to monitor implementation of the rule to drug-screen adults seeking city welfare benefits and another giving police more tools such as drones and surveillance cameras.

Sara Shortt, the campaign manager for No on F, said her group will likely partner with a union that intends "to challenge implementation" of...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up