Letters
Mar. 19, 2024
The Supreme Court got it right in Trump v. Anderson
U.C. Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky criticizes the Supreme Court’s conclusion but fails to acknowledge that Section 3 can only be implemented and enforced through legislation enacted by Congress.
Kris Whitten
Retired California deputy attorney gener
U.C. Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's article in the March 12 Daily Journal entitled "Unanimous, but wrong," uses questionable analysis about how to interpret the U.S. Constitution in reaching his conclusion that all nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices erred in Trump v. Anderson, 218 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2024)...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In