This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Immigration

May 14, 2024

Appeals court panel appears puzzled by arguments in asylum seeker case

The case is one of several that is percolating through the court system about the administration's requirement that asylum seekers schedule an appointment using a mobile app known as CBP One at a Point of Entry and what happens if they do not.

Appeals court panel appears puzzled by arguments in asylum seeker case
The New York Times

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Monday seemed confused by arguments by attorneys for Al Otro Lado Inc. and the federal government concerning whether to enforce a Biden administration rule turning back asylum seekers who sought to cross the border without making an appointment on a smartphone app.

The case is one of several that is percolating through the court system about the administration's requirement that asylum seekers schedule an appointment using a mobile ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up