This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Personal Injury & Torts

Aug. 4, 2006

$28 Million In Punitives Await Ruling

A $28 million award against Philip Morris in a sick-smoker case remains in limbo while the U.S. Supreme Court re-examines limits on punitive-damages awards.

By Itir Yakar
Daily Journal Staff Writer
     
A $28 million award against Philip Morris in a sick-smoker case remains in limbo while the U.S. Supreme Court re-examines limits on punitive-damages awards.
      On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court voted 6-0 to hold off its review of the Los Angeles case until the nation's high court issues new guidelines in the case of a sick smoker from Oregon who won a large award against Philip Morris.
      California's appellate courts have slashed several punitive-damages awards in light of a landmark 2003 ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court that significantly limited punitive-damages awards.
      In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct. 1513, the high court held that, in most cases, awards exceeding a 9-1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages would violate the Constitution's Due Process Clause.
      But the U.S. Supreme Court indicated in May that it intends to revisit the issue. The justices agreed to hear an appeal by Philip Morris challenging a $79.6 million punitive-damages award to the widow of an Oregon smoker. Philip Morris v. Williams, 05-1256.
      In the California case, smoker Betty Bullock accused the cigarette giant of misleading the public about the harms of cigarettes and stating that smoking was not linked to lung cancer. Bullock v. Philip Morris, S143850.
     
      In 2002, a Los Angeles jury awarded smoker Bullock $850,000 in compensatory damages and $28 billion in punitive damages. The trial court later reduced the punitive-damages award to $28 million.
      The 2nd District's ruling upheld that award in a divided April decision, concluding that Philip Morris' conduct was "highly reprehensible."
      Dissenting Justice Patti S. Kitching argued that the award is "a grossly excessive punishment" and violates the 14th Amendment.
      On appeal to the California Supreme Court, Philip Morris has argued that $28 million is excessive and asked the justices to reduce it in light of the Campbell ruling.
      Bullock's attorney has countered that the jury's initial $28 billion award should be reinstated. Bullock died in February 2003, and her family is pursuing the case.
      Chief Justice Ronald M. George was absent from Wednesday's weekly closed-door conference and did not participate in the vote.
     
#235914

Itir Yakarn

Daily Journal Staff Writer

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com