This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Litigation

Oct. 28, 2015

Ex-GC of Bio-Rad gets green light in whistleblower retaliation suit

District judge rules that ousted general counsel Sanford Wadler can sue Bio-Rad under whistleblower claims, reasoning that a brief filed in support of Wadler by the Securities and Exchange Commission made such claims viable.

By Saul Sugarman
Daily Journal Staff Writer

SAN FRANCISCO - The former general counsel of Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. has been given the green light in his federal lawsuit that claims the company fired him in a "classic case of whistleblower retaliation."

U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero ruled Friday that Sanford S. Wadler can sue Bio-Rad under whistleblower claims, reasoning that a brief filed in support of Wadler by the Securities and Exchange Commission made such claims viable.

The opinion denies in part Bio-Rad's motion to dismiss, allowing Wadler to proceed under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which offered job security to people who reported their employers to the SEC.

In their motion to dismiss, Bio-Rad's lawyers with Latham & Watkins LLP argued that Dodd-Frank offered protection against "employers," or companies, and not individuals within those companies.

Spero disagreed. Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories et al., 15-CV2356 (N.D. Cal., filed May 27, 2015).

"The court concludes that Congress intended that Dodd-Frank provide for individual liability," Spero wrote. "The court rejects defendants' assertion that the Dodd-Frank claim must be dismissed as to the individual defendants."

In the underlying case, Wadler claims Bio-Rad fired him after he discovered the company was involved in "extensive bribery" in Russia, Thailand, Vietnam and China.

Linda M. Inscoe, a San Francisco-based partner with Latham & Watkins LLP who is listed as the lead attorney defending Bio-Rad, could not be reached.

Kevin B. Clune, a San Francisco-based partner with Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, who represents Wadler, cheered Spero's ruling in an email.

"The decision sends a clear message to the highest levels of the corporate hierarchy that senior executives and directors will be held accountable - in addition to the corporation itself - if they retaliate against those who seek to stop corporate fraud and corruption," Clune said.

saul_sugarman@dailyjournal.com

#261090

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com