This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Feb. 18, 2016

Top Defense Result: Pryor v. Overseas Administrative Services Ltd.

See more on Top Defense Result: Pryor v. Overseas Administrative Services Ltd.

Wage and hour arbitration

JAMS

Michael J. Loeb

Defense attorneys: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Malcolm A. Heinicke, Martin D. Bern, Marja-Liisa Overbeck, Bryan H. Heckenlively

Plaintiffs' attorneys: Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, Peter S. Rukin, Jessica L. Riggin; Skikos Crawford Skikos & Joseph LLP, Mark G. Crawford; Altshuler Berzon LLP, James M. Finberg, Eve H. Cervantez, Connie K. Chan; Lewis, Feinberg, Lee & Jackson PC, Todd F. Jackson, Genevieve L. Casey, Magdalena Guadalupe Verdusco

Some 7,000 truck drivers working for U.S. military contractors in Iraq sued for allegedly unpaid wages and provided a rare example of a class action trial conducted in binding arbitration.

Following a nearly three-month trial before JAMS neutral Michael J. Loeb, the drivers lost their claim to recovery of up to $200 million in unpaid overtime wages plus fees and interest. Pryor v. Overseas Administrative Services Ltd., 1100052926 (JAMS).

Led by a Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP defense team, the win illustrated two cutting edge employment law issues: how to conduct class proceedings in arbitration, and how to address wage and hour claims by international employees.

As employers increasingly adopt arbitration programs, mass torts before an arbitrator are likely to look to the functioning of Pryor for guidance. And because the employees who brought the claims worked outside the U.S., the procedure established a framework for litigating employment contracts when pertinent statutes are unclear.

"The Munger Tolles team took a creative approach to untangle this intricate case," the firm said in a statement. It added that the plaintiffs' lawyers shifted theories during the course of the litigation, but eventually argued that mid-level supervisors set differing weekly hours limits at different times at different bases throughout Iraq.

Lead counsel Malcolm A. Heinicke recalled viewing the time records displayed on a graph. "That was one of those 'aha' moments," he said. "It was hard, objective data for what our clients were telling us all along."

- John Roemer

#270263

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com