This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Top Verdicts

Feb. 14, 2013

Top Defense Verdicts - Garamendi v. Artemis

See more on Top Defense Verdicts - Garamendi v. Artemis


Sitting in a courtroom in Los Angeles, roughly 5,600 miles from home, French businessman Francois Pinault faced off against former California State Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi, who sought $4.2 billion in damages from Pinault and his company, Artemis S.A.


Garamendi claimed that a conspiracy, which Artemis was previously found to have joined, affected the 1991 sale of insurance company Executive Life's junk bond portfolio.


California insurance regulators sold the junk bond portfolio in 1991 for $3.5 billion to Altus Finance, which eventually sold some of the bonds to Pinault's company and Artemis. Along the way, authorities said, Altus engaged in "portage agreements" - selling the shares to a third-party company to sidestep federal ownership laws.


The junk bond market rebounded throughout the 1990s, earning Artemis a fortune. A whistleblower came forward in 1998, leading to an investigation by the Department of Justice and subsequent lawsuits by the California Insurance Commission targeting several defendants, including Pinault and Artemis.


A 2005 civil trial against Artemis vindicated Pinault but hung on damages against Artemis. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later determined that the plaintiff's lawyers should be able to re-try the damages claim, setting up a 2012 trial before U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner in Los Angeles.


Plaintiffs argued that if the state insurance commission had known about the portage agreements, it would have sold the bonds to another group, such that the profits would go to Executive Life policyholders. Defense lawyers argued that Garamendi didn't sell the bonds to the other group because he deemed it "too risky at the time," not because of any conspiracy on the part of the defendant.


In October, a jury ruled that Artemis could retain the $4.2 billion in profits from the junk bonds.


"The key was that they could not prove that these portage agreements had anything to do with the decision that Garamendi made at the time," said Robert Weigel, a partner in Gibson Dunn & Crutcher's New York office.

- RYNE HODKOWSKI

<!-- Top Defense Verdicts - Garamendi v. Artemis -->

#271102

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com