This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Sep. 22, 2016

David K. Willingham

See more on David K. Willingham

Caldwell Leslie & Proctor PC

David K. Willingham

A dozen tech and finance executives whose names were spared from both docket and daily news cycle this past year have Willingham to thank for their anonymity — and clean record.

The former major frauds prosecutor has become a go-to in the white collar space for his ability to vaporize government threats, most often by detailing to federal agencies how much stronger their case would be without his client named as a defendant.

"It's a subtle advocacy in getting them to buy in to your view of the case, sometimes in a way that's not combative," Willingham said.

A well-placed doubt often goes farther than a blazing guns defense, he has found.

When a languishing investigation into 11 top employees at Countrywide Financial Corp. heated up again in 2015, Willingham, over a series of off-the-record meetings with the U.S. Attorney's office, explained how the novel legal theory undergirding the case might stretch too far for a judge's taste given the facts surrounding his specific client.

The investigation was officially closed with no charges filed against that executive in a matter of months.

Willingham parachuted in to a New York suit on the eve of trial to defend litigation financier Roni Dersovitz in a matter that had been litigated for years.

Trying a new strategy, Willingham asked the judge to conduct a settlement conference, during which he explained why the plaintiff's claims were worth far less.

"He finally paid attention, said, 'This is going to be a 30-day waste of time,' and granted a motion for directed verdict dismissing all claims," he recounted. Albano v. Dersovitz , 23368-10 (Sup. Ct. N.Y., Nassau County, filed May 4, 2011).

Willingham currently represents former Hyperloop One general counsel Afshin Pishevar in litigation with former employees. In July, he successfully dismissed a restraining order, arguing claims that his client threatened a plaintiff with a noose were fabricated to gain leverage in a separate suit. BamBrogan v. Hyperloop Technologies Inc., BC626780 (L.A. Super. Ct., filed July 12, 2016).

— America Hernandez

#280470

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com