This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

May 25, 2017

Stacy Horth-Neubert

See more on Stacy Horth-Neubert

Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP and affiliates Los Angeles

Stacy Horth-Neubert

Horth-Neubert handles a wide array of complex commercial matters, with an emphasis on state and local regulations, unfair business practices, false advertising, and contract disputes. But it's her pro bono work that Horth-Neubert views as particularly significant.

For the last ten years, Horth-Neubert has served as head coordinator for the pro bono program at Skadden's Los Angeles office. Horth-Neubert is currently leading a pro bono team of Skadden lawyers in a lawsuit alongside the National Immigration Law Center challenging a Louisiana law that prohibits many immigrants from obtaining marriage licenses.

Implemented in 2015 to ostensibly stop illegal immigrants from obtaining licenses, Horth-Neubert said the law has affected legal immigrants as well. Vo v. Gee et al., 2:16-cv-15639 (E.D. La., filed Oct. 18, 2016).

"We recently won a preliminary injunction from the federal court in Louisiana determining that the law was unconstitutional," Horth-Neubert said. "That was a very impactful and meaningful result, for the client and for the bigger picture in the fight for marriage equality in our country."

In her regular practice, Horth-Neubert has represented a number of online travel companies, like Expedia, Hotels.com, and Priceline.com, in legal battles nationwide over liabilities on taxes for room reservation fees.

One such case led to a December 2016 California Supreme Court ruling that ended a decadelong legal battle between the city of San Diego and Hotels.com, in which the court unanimously found that an online travel company is not the operator of a hotel and therefore cannot be liable for San Diego's transient occupancy tax. In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases, S218400 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Dec. 12, 2016).

"They issued a ruling that would have wide impacts across the state. We're still fighting two of these in California," Horth-Neubert said, referring to litigation over local transient occupancy taxes. "One in San Francisco, and the other in Los Angeles, which has been going on since 2005. That's been a long one."

— Steven Crighton

#288279

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com