This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Jan. 19, 2017

AB 2296: Electronic signatures

California's finally codified an employee's ability to electronically sign FEHA complaints with this bill. By David Harris and Yvette Davis

David Harris

Yvette Davis

Partner, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

2050 Main St Ste 600
Irvine , CA 92614

Phone: (714) 426-4607

Fax: (714) 754-0826

USC Law School

Yvette is the practice group leader for the firm's Employment & Labor Practice Group.

By David Harris and Yvette Davis

Assembly Bill 2296 is yet another example of the new reality of the electronic age, and shows that the state is moving closer and closer to a fully paperless system. California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) requires plaintiffs to exhaust their administrative remedies with either the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or the Department of Fair Employment & Housing (DFEH) by filing a complaint and obtaining a right-to-sue notice from the DFEH before filing a lawsuit alleging FEHA violations. By statute, a plaintiff's administrative complaint must be: (1) verified; (2) in writing; (3) comprised of facts that would give rise to a violation of FEHA; and (4) filed within one year of the date of the alleged violation. Government Code Section 12960(b). An employer can seek to dismiss the lawsuit if the employee failed to timely exhaust his/her administrative remedies. The purpose of the FEHA regulations (amended as of April 1, 2016) is to permit the DFEH to investigate the alleged employment discrimination to determine the merits and eliminate frivolous claims.

Under a straightforward reading of Section 12960(b), a plaintiff has to actually sign the claim in order to satisfy the statute's "written and verified" requirement. In practice, this is not the case. FEHA allows a plaintiff to satisfy the administrative exhaustion requirements by completing an online form and submitting it electronically without signature. See Rickards v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 206 Cal. App. 4th 1523 (2012) (unsigned electronically filed FEHA complaint satisfied signature requirements). While the use of an electronic signature was permitted by case law and the California Code of Regulations, it was never codified within the applicable Government Code. California's Legislature finally codified the employee's ability to electronically sign FEHA complaints last month with the passage of California AB 2296. The bill amended Government Code Section 16.5 and Civil Code Section 1633.2 to state that a verifiable digital signature shall have the same force and effect as a manual signature.

AB2296 also has the incidental and perhaps unintended consequence of relaxing another hurdle employees have to overcome before they can sue their employers for FEHA violations. Employees simply need to "fill in the box" on an electronic form and hit "send" on the computer to receive a right-to-sue letter. The process for filing complaints with the department and obtaining right-to-sue letters has become so streamlined, it appears to be little more than a formality.

#304198

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com