This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Andrew P. Bridges

By Craig Andersonn | Apr. 19, 2012

Intellectual Property

Apr. 19, 2012

Andrew P. Bridges

See more on Andrew P. Bridges

Fenwick & West LLP San Francisco



Bridges' primary accomplishments during the past year had nothing to do with his sharp advocacy in the courtroom, but instead with successful battles he waged on two fronts against government efforts to squelch websites accused of hosting infringing material.


He represented the operator of a hip-hop music blog, dajaz1.com, whose domain was seized by the government in late 2010 as part of an ongoing effort to crack down on the theft of intellectual property.


In December, the domain was returned after Bridges' persistent letters to the U.S. attorney's office in the Central District of California and a high-level public relations campaign to put pressure on the government.


Bridges' effort dovetailed nicely with his aggressive advocacy against the Stop Online Privacy Act and Protect IP Act. The two companion measures were pushed by the entertainment industry and designed to eliminate piracy by foreign websites but Bridges argued they would create problems for every online site.


The bills, which had strong support in Congress, suddenly collapsed after an aggressive campaign against them by Internet companies. Bridges had been scheduled to testify about his experience in the Dajaz case before U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa's (R-Calif.) oversight subcommittee, but that was canceled when support in Congress for the bills suddenly evaporated.


For much of the year, Bridges' campaign for his client was a lonely one, consisting largely of asking when he would get a chance to argue against the government's seizure in court.


The government never told him and kept getting secret extensions on their deadline to institute forfeiture proceedings that Bridges claims were illegal because the deadline to file a complaint had passed.


"I was a gadfly keeping the heat on the government," Bridges said. "They knew I was armed, ready for battle, and staying after them."


Bridges thinks the outcome of the dajaz1 case has made the government more skittish about seizing the domain names of blog sites.

- CRAIG ANDERSON

<!-- Andrew P. Bridges -->

#309487

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com