This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Feb. 18, 2015

Top Defense Results: Acuna v. Riddell Sports Inc.

See more on Top Defense Results: Acuna v. Riddell Sports Inc.
JAMES J. YUKEVICH, THOMAS BORNCAMP


At a time of growing concern about head injuries in football, and of damages that leagues and manufacturers might face, Yukevich Cavanaugh scored a significant defense win last March when a Los Angeles County jury cleared a helmet maker of all liability in a $37 million lawsuit.


Edward Acuna was a 17-year-old defensive lineman for Pomona's Garey High School when an on-field collision caused a severe brain injury. He was left partially paralyzed, ending his college aspirations.


In 2009, Acuna - through his father - sued Illinois-based Riddell Sports Inc., claiming that the maker of the Riddell Revolution helmet worn by the young athlete knowingly manufactured a defective helmet pad that led to his injury. Â


Acuna's attorney, Ronald L.M. Goldman of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman PC, argued that Riddell knew its helmets would offer better protection if made with high density vinyl nitrile - rather than polyurethane - for the padding.


During trial, Riddell's lawyers pushed back against those claims by challenging whether Acuna's injury could have been prevented by any helmet.


James Yukevich and Thomas Borncamp of Yukevich Cavanaugh argued that Acuna's injury was caused by a rapid rotational movement of the head, rather than the plaintiff's contention of a direct blow.


Through videos and testimony of witnesses, including a biomechanical engineer and the helmet's designer, they showed that no helmet could have prevented such a rare injury, Yukevich said.


Further, they presented the manufacturer's tests on the Riddell Revolution helmet and broke down its technology in plain language for the jury to prove that it's one of the best helmets on the market, Borncamp said.


"We showed that this company had a long history of optimizing head protection and invested a great deal in researching how to put the best helmet on someone's head and what are the best materials to use for the helmet," he said.


The jury deliberated for less than 30 minutes before finding that Riddell's helmet could not have prevented Acuna's injury. Acuna v. Riddell Sports Inc., LC090924 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct., filed Aug. 24, 2010).


"There were a lot of eyes on us at the time because it's rare that any of these helmet cases are actually being tried," Yukevich said. "The NCAA guys and the high school coaches ... all the way down to entry level Pop Warner-type teams, everybody wanted to follow and see exactly how this was going to develop."


Goldman admits there were mistakes made in the trial, but he holds that the jury couldn't get past the "ingrained myth" that choosing to play football means subjecting oneself to injury.


"When the myth and the science clash, the myth wins," Goldman said. "Unfortunately, I think we and our client felt victim to that, and it's a double tragedy."


The plaintiff didn't pursue an appeal, instead choosing to resolve litigation costs between the two parties.


"We accepted the verdict as it was, and everybody's moving forward," Goldman said.

- Kylie Reynolds

#339713

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com