This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Daniel M. Petrocelli

By Nicolas Sonnenburg | Sep. 20, 2017

Sep. 20, 2017

Daniel M. Petrocelli

See more on Daniel M. Petrocelli

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

Daniel M. Petrocelli

President Donald J. Trump and prize fighter Manny Pacquiao share one thing in common: attorney Daniel M. Petrocelli.

The high-profile O’Melveny litigator has been making headlines since he successfully obtained a wrongful death verdict against football legend O.J. Simpson in 1997.

Twenty years later, Petrocelli shows no signs of slowing down.

During the height of an intensely fought presidential campaign, Petrocelli was able to convince a federal judge to refrain from scheduling the trial in a case alleging that then candidate Trump’s eponymous university defrauded students until after the election. He settled the case on the eve of trial.

“We were able to get everything resolved,” he said of the several lawsuits his client was facing. “That was the best result for the country at large, to not have to endure a lengthy set of trials against a sitting president.”

Petrocelli notes that the cases were settled with no admission of fault. Low v. Trump University, 3:10-cv-00940 (S.D. Cal., filed Apr. 30, 2010).

He’s hot off another victory that involves a fight of a different kind: boxing.

In the end of August, Petrocelli helped convince U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that his client, Many Pacquiao, had concealed the fact that he had suffered a serious injury before one of the most anticipated fights in boxing history, which pit Pacquiao against the legendary Floyd Mayweather. In Re: Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation, 2:15-ml-02639-RGK-PLA (C.D. Cal., filed Aug. 17, 2015).

“We think that ruling is very important because it affirms a very important principle: people who are disappointed in the outcome of a live performance are not entitled to get their money back because they don’t like the outcome.”

— Nicolas Sonnenburg

#343390

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com