This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Civil Litigation

Apr. 9, 2019

Johnson & Johnson scores a win in talc lawsuit

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has won the latest in a series of civil suits arguing its talc-based baby powder could cause cancer.

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has won the latest in a series of civil suits arguing its talc-based baby powder could cause cancer.

A jury in Long Beach rejected the claims of a 65-year-old former teacher, represented by Weitz & Luxenberg P.C., that the company's talc-based baby powder contained asbestos. Blinkinsop v. Albertson Co., BC677764 (Superior Court, Los Angeles Co. Long Beach filed September 29, 2017)

Johnson & Johnson, represented by King & Spalding LLP, has faced many similar cases in recent years with more than a dozen slated for trial throughout 2019, according to court filings.

The company could eventually face up to 11,700 lawsuits over the safety of its talc-based products, according to its most recent quarterly filing.

Of 11 cases focused on the company's talc-based products allegedly being contaminated with asbestos, plaintiffs have prevailed in three, including a $4.69 billion verdict in July last year. Johnson & Johnson won three others with the remaining five concluding in hung juries,

The Long Beach decision comes less than a month after an Alameda County jury hit Johnson & Johnson with a $24.9 million verdict in a lawsuit that similarly claimed talc was asbestos tainted. Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson, RGI7882401 (Alameda Super. Ct. filed April 14, 2017).

Plaintiff Robert Blinkinsop alleged in court documents he used Johnson & Johnson's talc based products throughout his life for hygienic purposes and was not warned about its potential cancer-causing properties.

"Defendants propagated misinformation to instill a false sense of security and safety" in its users, according to Blinkinsop's complaint.

In addition, the company "opted to manufacture, distribute and install said asbestos and asbestos-containing products without attempting to protect users from or warn users of the high risk of injury or death," according to court documents.

While Johnson & Johnson has elected to settle some cases based around asbestos, the company contends its products do not contain the carcinogen.

#351915

Carter Stoddard

Daily Journal Staff Writer
carter_stoddard@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com