Jul. 26, 2019
JAMS Session
The 9th Circuit is mulling whether a JAMS arbitrator should have disclosed his part-ownership of the neutral company to parties whose dispute he judged, and whether such an arrangement creates a problematic incentive as to repeat parties. JAMS' Sr. Vice President and Chief Legal and Operating Officer Kimberly Taylor, and Prof. Katherine Stone (UCLA Law) offer competing views
#353675
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390
Send a letter to the editor:
Email: letters@dailyjournal.com