This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Labor/Employment

Dec. 31, 2019

Uber, Postmates sue to stop AB5, claim it’s unconstitutional

Ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies Inc. and food delivery service Postmates Inc. filed a lawsuit late Monday afternoon against California Attorney General Xavier Becerra alleging the employee-presumptive Assembly Bill 5, which takes effect Wednesday, is unconstitutional.

Ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies Inc. and food delivery service Postmates Inc. filed a lawsuit late Monday afternoon against California Attorney General Xavier Becerra alleging the employee-presumptive Assembly Bill 5, which takes effect Wednesday, is unconstitutional.

According to the complaint filed in the Central District of California, the two "gig economy" companies claim AB 5 violates the U.S. Constitution's Ninth and 14th Amendments, Article I, and the contracts clause.

The legislation, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September also violates the equal protection, inalienable rights, due process and contracts clauses of the California Constitution, the complaint alleges. Olson v. California, 19-CV10956 (C.D. Cal., filed Dec. 30, 2019).

"AB 5 is an irrational and unconstitutional law statute designed to target and stifle workers and companies in the on-demand economy," the complaint reads.

Along with named plaintiffs Lydia Olson and Miguel Perez, the companies claim their business model is a free market system that allows independent service providers the flexibility and freedom to work based on their own schedules and preferences, the suit alleges.

The law, introduced by Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, and codifying the decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 2018 DJDAR 3856, is a hostile attempt to "force network companies to change their classification of workers who use their technology" from independent contractors to employees, the suit alleges.

Under AB 5, workers are now presumed employees unless they pass the three-prong "ABC" test and prove they are a) free from the hirer's control and direction, b) work outside the usual course of the hirer's business, and c) engage in the same kind of work as the hirer independently, to be considered independent contractors.

"Today, Uber will join Postmates and two independent workers in California to bring a constitutional legal challenge of Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) on the basis of lack of equal protection and due process under both federal and state law," Uber said Monday in a statement.

Calls to Becerra's office were not immediately returned late Monday.

#355652

Glenn Jeffers

Daily Journal Staff Writer
glenn_jeffers@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com