This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Vernon Unsworth v. Elon Musk

By Steven Crighton | Feb. 19, 2020

Feb. 19, 2020

Vernon Unsworth v. Elon Musk

See more on Vernon Unsworth v. Elon Musk

Defamation

Vernon Unsworth v. Elon Musk
Alexander B. Spiro

Defamation

Central District

U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson

Plaintiff's attorneys: Wood, Wilson, Grunberg & Wade, L. Lin Wood, G. Taylor Wilson, Jonathan D. Grunberg, Nicole J. Wade; Chatham Law Group, R. Christopher Chatham; Weisbart Springer Hayes LLP, Matt C. Wood

When Tesla CEO Elon Musk called an expatriate British cave diver a "pedo guy" in the midst of an escalating Twitter feud, he likely didn't know he'd be setting legal precedent.

But after refusing to back down from a defamation lawsuit filed by plaintiff Vernon Unsworth, leading to a first-of-its-kind trial in the Central District of California, he seemed to understand that the verdict in his favor was a statement against litigating social media beefs.

"My faith in humanity is restored," Musk said while emerging from the U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson's courtroom, moments after a jury rejected Unsworth's defamation claims in December.

William C. Price

Musk tossed out the "pedo guy" label in a tweet to his millions of social media followers, in response to an earlier comment made by Unsworth in a televised CNN International interview belittling Musk's contributions to the rescue of a team of young soccer players trapped in a Thailand cave in 2018.

Though initially appearing to back down with an apology in a follow-up tweet, Musk would later double down on the "pedo guy" label, telling a social media follower that he would "bet you a signed dollar it's true" and questioning why Unsworth had not sued if the allegations were false.

Unsworth would sue less than a month later, represented by Atlanta-based litigator L. Lin Wood.

At trial, Wood compared the devastation wrought by Musk's labeling of Unsworth as a pedophile to a nuclear explosion, claiming the label had ostracized him from social circles and negatively impacted the prospective value of his life story.

Alex Spiro, a partner at Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and counsel to Musk, conversely downplayed the significance of "pedo guy," likening it to a harmless schoolyard insult. Spiro said the "pedo guy" label even had a significantly different meaning in Musk's native South Africa, roughly equivalent to calling someone a creepy old man. Vernon Unsworth v. Elon Musk, 18-cv-08048 (C.D. Cal., filed Sept. 28, 2018)

The latter argument clearly resonated with the jury, who rejected Unsworth's request for nearly $200 million in damages after less than a half an hour in deliberations. Asked for comment earlier this month on the verdict, Spiro simply replied "the jury got it right." Wood did not respond to a request for comment.

--Steven Crighton

#356349

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com