This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

May 19, 2021

Julia B. Strickland

See more on Julia B. Strickland

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Julia B. Strickland

Strickland is managing partner of Stroock’s Los Angeles offices, a member of the firm’s executive committee and the chair of the financial services litigation, regulation and enforcement group.

In December 2020, Strickland obtained a groundbreaking opinion from a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in favor of client Verizon Wireless Services LLC on a question relating to appellate review of arbitration orders. The panel reversed its earlier view of the matter. The court at her urging turned away an argument by a plaintiff seeking to get around a trial judge’s order compelling arbitration in a potential class action over warranty coverage of cell phones. Langere v. Verizon Wireless Services LLC, 983 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir., op. filed Dec. 29, 2020).

When the trial judge stayed the matter so an arbitration could proceed, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action and then appealed his own dismissal, seeking to avoid arbitration by manufacturing appellate jurisdiction over the matter, citing case law from 2010.

“This plaintiff was perhaps too clever by half,” said Strickland, who argued the issue virtually.

She pointed out that the maneuver—even though allowed by the 2010 opinion—had been overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017 Microsoft Corp. v. Baker decision, which nixed a similar effort. The panel agreed, dismissing the appeal, affirming the primacy of arbitration and stressing that the American Arbitration Act limits appeals from arbitration orders.

In a series of arbitration decisions over the past three years stemming from Strickland’s winning 2017 argument before the state Supreme Court in McGill v. Citibank NA, she has successfully compelled arbitration of all claims in potential class actions against Chase, Citibank and American Express. She has ended other cases with modest settlements of potential class claims for Discover and Synchrony.

In each case, the issue has been over “public injunctive relief,” which can render a bank’s arbitration provision unenforceable. Strickland has successfully persuaded courts that the outcome sought was not in that category. “It’s a very hot issue right now,” she said.

— John Roemer

#362780

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com