This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Sep. 21, 2022

Micha Star Liberty

See more on Micha Star Liberty

Liberty Law Office, Inc.

Two goals fueled Micha Star Liberty when she launched her plaintiff-side, civil rights-focused Liberty Law Office, Inc. in 2005: to represent clients who have suffered serious injury or abuse and to promote systemic change in disability rights and civil rights law.

Both objectives took a severe blow when the state Supreme Court ruled in August that the Unruh Civil Rights Act doesn't apply to public schools or other public institutions, but only to private business establishments. Brennon B. v. Superior Court, S266254 (Ca. S. Ct., op. filed Aug. 4, 2022).

Liberty represents petitioner Brennon B., a severely autistic boy who was a special-education student at De Anza High School in Contra Costa County when he was sexually assaulted by students and a school employee. She was shaken by the 7-0 opinion affirming dismissal of Brennon's claim. "Shocked but not surprised, given how the argument went," she said. "I was scared for my special needs clients. This leaves public school students with a lack of fundamental civil rights remedies that private school students have."

Brennon B. isn't entirely out of luck because Liberty obtained a multimillion-dollar settlement for him with the school district in earlier litigation that left unresolved the applicability of Unruh. Brennon B. v. West Contra Costa Unified School District (Contra Costa Co. Super. Ct., filed July 5, 2016).

The high court's opinion, she said, is especially awful because it is far broader than Brennon's case; it leaves other public institutions also unprotected by the 1959 Unruh law. "Libraries, courthouses, the DMV--this is a wholesale exclusion of public entities from liability for discrimination. This is not in alignment with the State of California's position in the vanguard of offering civil rights to all our citizens."

So she's not giving up, vowing to seek a legislative solution. "The Supreme Court all but invited us to do so by its repeated references to legislative fixes," Liberty said. "We're working with our allies in the disability community and the civil rights community about how to get the conversation started with lawmakers."

Liberty is a member of the State Bar's Closing the Justice Gap Working Group and a past president of Consumer Attorneys of California. She's been outspoken in opposition to proposals for tech companies to sell legal software and services to consumers.

"They want corporations to own law firms and phone apps to dispense legal advice," she protested. "It's tort reform by putting profit before people. There's core agreement that there's a justice gap, but the other side wants no guardrails. It's a spirited debate."

Liberty has been a White House intern and has worked on Capitol Hill. Might she run for office herself? "I'm quite busy trying to bring down the patriarchy. Still, we need more women and lawyers in political office," she said. "Let's just leave it at that."

#369224

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com