This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Oct. 25, 2023

Jeremy T. Elman

See more on Jeremy T. Elman

Duane Morris LLP

Jeremy T. Elman

In high-stakes litigation, Jeremy T. Elman represents Carl Zeiss Meditec, who seeks damages and permanent injunctive relief in the billion-dollar ophthalmic diagnostic industry. He secured a preliminary injunction and is set for a two-week jury trial in February 2024 in the Northern District of California. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., et al., 4:19-cv-04162 (N.D. Cal, filed July 19, 2019).

Notably, Elman led a team of dozens of attorneys in uncovering substantial evidence of alleged infringement across the globe. The case revolves around trade secrets encompassing encrypted algorithms, which are alleged to have been misappropriated by the defendants in an effort to develop competing products. Elman's work also entailed a forensic examination of nearly 200 devices belonging to the defendants.

This case, and others in which Elman has been involved during the past year, are significant because of the necessity of cataloging trade secrets for protection, safeguarding trade secrets when related products are commercially available, protecting software and source code as trade secrets and distinguishing between trade secrets and proprietary information.

Elman also helps clients differentiate between software that can be protected as trade secrets and open-source software. Elman and his team have worked on developing and enforcing trade secret policies to safeguard sensitive information, especially in industries with high employee turnover and remote work.

Elman pointed out a few key trends he has observed. One notable one is the increasing prohibition of non-compete agreements by states and possibly the FTC. This shift poses challenges to employers who traditionally used non-competes to protect trade secrets, requiring clients to adapt their strategies. Additionally, Elman highlighted the emerging role of AI in trade secrets. "Can a generative AI software create its own trade secrets as an alternative to patents or copyrights where the AI cannot be considered an owner or author?" He said. "Or could all the recent developments in AI allow entities to comprehend information that would otherwise be protectable as a trade secret? Would using an AI to learn information be considered improper means for misappropriation purposes? It's likely this issue will start to arise soon in the courts, just as it has for other IP rights."

Elman is actively involved in various professional activities and associations, including serving as a panelist in Lex Machina's 2023 Trade Secret Report webinar and as a dialogue leader at the Sedona Conference's Annual Trade Secret Meeting. He is also a member of the Sedona Conference Working Group on Trade Secrets (WG12).

#375370

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com