Ruling by
A. Wallace TashimaLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Joseph C. Spero
Oakland's inability to pay for an NFL team was not a direct result of the NFL's ultracompetitive pricing for its teams and it therefore did not have standing to pursue a Sherman Act antitrust claim.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In