Newman v. Union Oil Company of California

DAVID NEWMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Appellant. No. B101317 (Super. Ct. No. BC 111225) California Court of Appeal Second Appellate District Division One Filed June 6, 1997 THE COURT:
        IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on May 8, 1997, be modified in the following particulars:

        1. In the last paragraph beginning on page 13**. the fourth sentence which reads, "Newman and amici argue the statute's primary purpose is to protect consumer privacy." is now modified to read as follows:

        Newman and amici curiae5 argue the statute's primary purpose is to protect consumer privacy.

        This modification does not have an effect on the judgment.



* ORTEGA, Acting P. J.


** See Daily Appellate Report of May 12, 1997, column 2, paragraph 4, line 12.


5 CALPIRG Charitable Trust, Consumer Action and Consumer Federation of America.