Under Uniform Trade Secrets Act, attorney fees are correctly awarded where bad faith trade secret misappropriation claim was based on mere speculation.
Cite as
2012 DJDAR 10964Published
Aug. 8, 2012Filing Date
Aug. 7, 2012SASCO,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
No. G045229
(Super. Ct. No. 30-2008-00110031)
California Courts of Appeal
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three
Filed August 7, 2012
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING PETITION
FOR REHEARING;
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 11, 2012, be modified as follows:
On page 4, the paragraph under the heading ?Dismissal? after the first sentence that ends with the word ?discovery? add the following sentence:
?On July 7, 2010, SASCO substituted in new counsel.?
In the same paragraph on page 4, the last sentence which begins with ?But on October 20, 2010, SASCO . . . .? delete the word ?But? so that the sentence reads as follows:
?On October 20, 2010, SASCO voluntarily dismissed the action without having filed an opposition to the motion for summary judgment.?
The modification does not change the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
IKOLA, J.
WE CONCUR:
RYLAARSDAM, ACTING P. J.
ARONSON, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424