This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Los Angeles Cty. Flood Control v. Natural Resources, et. al.

Is there "discharge" under Clean Water Act when water from navigable waterway flows through infrastructure and then returns back within same waterway?



Cite as

2012 DJDAR 8684

Published

Jun. 26, 2012

Filing Date

Jun. 25, 2012

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review Los Angeles County Flood Control v. Natural Resources, a case from the 9th Circuit's Court of Appeals involving potential violations of the Clean Water Act (CLA) caused by the County's storm infrastructure. Los Angeles County discharged storm runoff into the Los Angeles River from various points, allegedly causing an increase in river pollution. The question presented here is whether there is a "discharge" under the CLA when water from a navigable waterway flows through a storm system and then is transferred back later within the same body of water.

— Michael Elliottn



§§§§

 

LOS ANGELES CTY. FLOOD CONTROL

v.

NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

 

No. 11-460

U.S. Supreme Court

Filed June 25, 2012

 

     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited  to Question 2 presented by the petition.  

 

 

#211920

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390