This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Wilder v. Salvation Army

Order


Cite as

1998 DJCAR 5317

Published

Oct. 14, 1998

Filing Date

Oct. 13, 1998


SAMUEL J. WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SALVATION ARMY, sued as: The Salvation Army (dormitory supervisor Buddy Campbell) - Buddy Campbell, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-5120 (N.D. Oklahoma) (D.C. No. 97-CV-93-B) United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit Filed October 13, 1998 ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
        After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
        This case is before us on Samuel Wilder's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs or fees in order to appeal the dismissal of his action against the Salvation Army and others in which he alleges that his civil rights were violated because the defendant defamed him, withheld some personal effects, and violated the RICO statute. This matter has been before us once before without success in Appeal No. 97-5227.
        In addition to the claims referred to above, Mr. Wilder claims various errors with respect to his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), failure to appoint counsel, failure to consolidate with another action, failure to stay the proceedings, failure to permit discovery, and so on.
        Substantially for the reasons set forth in the orders of the district court filed March 24, 1998, and June 12, 1998, and based upon our own review of the file, we conclude that this action and appeal are frivolous. Accordingly, Mr. Wilder's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, all pending motions are denied, and this appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.


ENTERED FOR THE COURT
        Stephen H. Anderson
        Circuit Judge



*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.


#212295

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424