Anti-SLAPP grant proper where plaintiff's complaint comprises communications with future defendant's attorney, in anticipation of litigation.
Cite as
2016 DJDAR 1989Published
Feb. 29, 2016Filing Date
Feb. 26, 2016ELIZABETH KARNAZES
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
TYLER ARES et al.,
Defendants;
ASHLEY D. POSNER,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
No. B246308
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BC489740)
California Courts of Appeal
Second Appellate District
Division Two
Filed February 26, 2016
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:*
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 27, 2016, be modified as follows:
1. On page 11, the third sentence of the first full paragraph is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place:
Appellant provides no discussion of any law applying these provisions to require a trial court to provide a full copy of its tentative ruling to an individual appearing by telephone.
2. On page 11, the last sentence of the second full paragraph is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place:
It makes no mention of any requirement that the court provide full electronic or faxed copies of tentative rulings to parties making telephonic appearances, regardless of whether the court was notified in advance of the telephonic appearance.
There is no change in the judgment.
Appellant?s petition for rehearing is denied.
*ASHMANN-GERST, Acting P. J.,
CHAVEZ, J.,
HOFFSTADT, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424