Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard

ED RUTLEDGE et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Defendant and Respondent;

BIZCOM ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Objector and Respondent.

H036790

(Santa Clara County

Super. Ct. No. CV817837

California Courts of Appeal

Sixth Appellate District

Filed August 21, 2015

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 22, 2015, be modified as follows:

1.  On the signature line 2, the name ?PREMO, J.? is replaced with ?ELIA, J.? and on the signature line 3, the name ?ELIA, J.? is replaced with ?WALSH, J.^*? so the signature page reflects the correct panel as follows:

                                           RUSHING, P.J.

WE CONCUR:

ELIA, J.

WALSH, J.^*

     There is no change in judgment.

     Respondent?s petition for rehearing is denied.

                                           RUSHING, P.J.

WE CONCUR:

ELIA, J.

WALSH, J.^*

^* Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.