This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Empire Waste Management v. Town of Windsor

Statute granting governing body authority to grant exclusive franchise isn't violated by voter referendum.



Cite as

1998 DJDAR 12034

Published

Mar. 11, 1999

Filing Date

Nov. 24, 1998



MODIFICATION

GOVERNMENT

Statute granting governing body authority to grant exclusive franchise isn't violated by voter referendum. EMPIRE WASTE MANAGEMENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TOWN OF WINDSOR, Defendant and Respondent. No. A079840 (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. 215381) California Court of Appeal First Appellate District Division Four Filed November 24, 1998
THE COURT:
        It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 30, 1998, is modified as follows:

        (1) On page 5,* lines 14 and 15 are modified to read as follows:
                "government agency." The Act defines "local governing body" as "the legislative body of the city, county, or special district which has authority to provide solid waste handling services." (§ 40150.) This is quintessentially generic language. More than a dozen statutory definitions in other codes-some broad, some very specific-confirm that "governing body" has far from a fixed meaning.[fn. 3] We therefore

        (2) In footnote 3,** the fourth line from the bottom is modified to insert the word "other" between the words "To provisions" so that the line will now read:

                §§ 34205, 36073, 37854.) Two other provisions in the Public Resources Code define

        These modifications do not effect a change in the judgment.
        The petition for rehearing is denied.


*         See Daily Appellate Report of November 3, 1998, page 11282, column 1, paragraph 10, line 2.

** See Daily Appellate Report of November 3, 1998, page 11282, column 2, footnote 3, line 30.


#215648

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390