Cite as
2013 DJDAR 7171Published
Jun. 5, 2013Filing Date
Jun. 3, 2013Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review Lexmark International Inc. v. Static Control Components Inc., a case from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals involving a print manufacturer who sued a competitor for patent infringement. After the district court dismissed Static's counterclaims under the Lanham Act and the North Carolina Unfair Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a jury ruled against Lexmark's patent inducement claims and found that Lexmark had misused its patents. The 6th Circuit reversed the district court's decision to dismiss Static's Lanham Act and state law claims, because Static had alleged its reputation and sales were harmed by statements from Lexmark. The remainder of the district court's decision was affirmed.
— Michael Leen
LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
v.
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.
No. 12-873
U.S. Supreme Court
Filed June 3, 2013
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424