This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

Order


Cite as

2013 DJDAR 7171

Published

Jun. 5, 2013

Filing Date

Jun. 3, 2013

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review Lexmark International Inc. v. Static Control Components Inc., a case from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals involving a print manufacturer who sued a competitor for patent infringement. After the district court dismissed Static's counterclaims under the Lanham Act and the North Carolina Unfair Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a jury ruled against Lexmark's patent inducement claims and found that Lexmark had misused its patents. The 6th Circuit reversed the district court's decision to dismiss Static's Lanham Act and state law claims, because Static had alleged its reputation and sales were harmed by statements from Lexmark. The remainder of the district court's decision was affirmed.

— Michael Leen



§§§§

 

 

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.

v.

STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.

 

No. 12-873

U.S. Supreme Court

Filed June 3, 2013

 

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

 

 

 

#216113

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424