Unfair Practices Act violation does not require defendant to have ability to recoup losses following below-cost pricing.
Cite as
2010 DJDAR 12540Published
Aug. 13, 2010Filing Date
Aug. 11, 2010BAY GUARDIAN COMPANY,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
NEW TIMES MEDIA LLC et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
No. A122448
(Super. Ct. No. CGC-04-435584)
California Courts of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division One
Filed August 11, 2010
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 11, 2010, be modified in the following particulars:
1. On page 40, in the Disposition, another paragraph is added. The Disposition will now read:
Accordingly, the judgment against defendant East Bay Express is reversed. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.
Respondent to recover costs on appeal.
There is no change in the judgment.
Date: August 11, 2010
Marchiano, P. J.
Trial Court
San Francisco County Superior Court
Trial Judge
Honorable Marla Miller
For Defendants and Appellants
Reed Smith LLP
Paul D. Fogel, Esq.
Raymond A. Cardozo, Esq.
Dennis Peter Maio, Esq.;
Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP
H. Sinclair Kerr, Jr., Esq.
James M. Wagstaffe, Esq.
Ivo Labar, Esq.;
Village Voice Media, LLC
Don Bennett Moon, Esq.
For Plaintiff and Respondent
Joseph A. Hearst, Esq.;
E. Craig Moody, Esq.;
Ralph C. Alldredge, Esq.;
Richard P. Hill, Esq.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424