This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters General Fund v. Fleming Companies Inc.

Order


Cite as

1999 DJCAR 1718

Published

Mar. 29, 1999

Filing Date

Mar. 26, 1999


INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS GENERAL FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FLEMING COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.- Nos. 97-6035, 97-6132 (D.C. No. 96-CV-1650) (Western District of Oklahoma) United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit Filed March 26, 1999 ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and TACHA, Circuit Judges.
        Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is whether Oklahoma law restricts the authority to create and implement shareholder rights plans exclusively to the board of directors. The second is whether shareholders may propose resolutions requiring that shareholder rights plans be submitted to the shareholders for vote at the succeeding annual meeting. We certified these questions to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, and it responded "no" to the first question and "yes" to the second. International Brotherhood of Teamsters General Fund v. Fleming Companies, Inc., No. 90,185, 1999 WL 35227 (Okla. Jan. 26, 1999). After subsequent briefing in this court by the parties, we have concluded the issues before us have been resolved by the response of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, and further proceedings are not required.
        The judgment of the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. Appellee's motion for attorney fees on appeal is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED for determination of a reasonable amount of fees to be awarded and for entry of an appropriate judgment on the merits of this case.


ENTERED FOR THE COURT
        John C. Porfilio
        Circuit Judge



* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.


#221461

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424