This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Sanchez v. Kern Emergency Medical Transportation Corp.

Summary judgment in favor of ambulance company affirmed, where plaintiff's expert witness' statements properly excluded and plaintiff cannot demonstrate triable issue of material fact.



Cite as

2017 DJDAR 1505

Published

Feb. 17, 2017

Filing Date

Feb. 16, 2017


 

ABRAHAM SANCHEZ, JR.,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

KERN EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

 

No. F069843

(Super. Ct. No. S1500-CV-270098)

 

ORDER

MODIFYING OPINION

[No Change in Judgment]

California Courts of Appeal

Fifth Appellate District

Filed January 16, 2017

 

     Having read and considered Respondent?s ?Request for Correction and Modification? filed on February 8, 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the partially published opinion filed herein on February 2, 2017, be modified as follows:

 

On page 12, at the end of the first full paragraph, the word ?median? is changed to ?mean? so the sentence reads:

 

   ?Defendant computed an approximate ?, by deducting from the eight minutes between 21:30 and 21:38 the approximate mean time to complete    the spinal precautions (five & one-half minutes).?

 

On page14, second and third sentences in the last paragraph, the misspelled name ?Schrager? is changed to correctly read ?Schriger? the three times it appears in the two sentences.

 

On page 17, second sentence of the last paragraph that begins with ?This was not a case,? the words ?to support? are changed to ?that supported? so the sentence reads:

 

   ?This was not a case in which the experts relied on different medical    studies or different interpretations of the medical literature that    supported their opinions; in such a case, the court ?.?

 

     Except for the modifications set forth, the opinion previously filed remains unchanged.

 

     This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.

 

    

HILL, P. J.

 

WE CONCUR:

POOCHIGIAN, J.

 

 

 

 

 

#221983

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390