This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Anderson-Barker)

Civil Discovery Act Applies to petitions brought under California Public Records Act as actions are special proceedings and civil in nature.





Cite as

2017 DJDAR 2750

Published

Mar. 22, 2017

Filing Date

Mar. 20, 2017


 

CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

Respondent.

 

CYNTHIA ANDERSON-BARKER,

Real Party in Interest.

 

No. B269525

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BS156058)

California Courts of Appeal

Second Appellate District

Division Seven

Filed March 20, 2017

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

(NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT)

 

THE COURT:    

 

     IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed March 2, 2017 be corrected as follows:

 

1.        Page 1 Superior Court judge name is Joanne B. O?Donnell; 

 

2.        Page 1 City Attorney name is Gabrielle L. Ruha;

 

3.        Page 6, last paragraph second line ?who had represented  Colleen Flynn?;

 

4.        Page 17, line 4, ?[t]he legislative purpose of expediency and immediate reviewability . . . cannot be served by transforming a public record request into a drawn out discovery battle.?  (Wilder v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 77, 84.)

 

The petition for rehearing is denied.  The foregoing does not change the judgment.

 

 

ZELON, Acting P. J.        

SEGAL, J.,        

KEENY, J. (Assigned)

 

 

#222177

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424