Humphries v. County of Los Angeles;

CRAIG ARTHUR HUMPHRIES;

WENDY DAWN ABORN HUMPHRIES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES;

LEROY BACA,

individually and

in his official capacity as

Los Angeles County Sheriff;

MICHAEL L. WILSON,

individually and in his

official capacity as a Detective

and/or Deputy of the Los Angeles

County Sheriff?s Department;

CHARLES T. ANSBERRY,

Individually and in his official

capacity as a Detective

of the Los Angeles

County Sheriff?s Department;

BILL LOCKYER,

Attorney General, in his

official capacity as Attorney

General of the State of California,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-56467

D.C. No. CV-03-00697-JVS

Central District of

California,

Santa Ana

United States Court of Appeals

Ninth Circuit

Filed May 26, 2011

On Remand From

The United States Supreme Court

Before: Jay S. Bybee

and

Milan D. Smith, Jr.,

Circuit Judges,

 and

Richard Mills,

Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

After finding Appellants to be the prevailing parties in this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, we ordered Appellee County of Los Angeles to pay 10% of Appellants? attorney?s fees. See No. 05-56467 (June 22, 2009) at 1, 3-4. We later adopted the recommendation of the Appellate Commissioner, which calculated this portion of the fee award to be $59,258.09. See No. 05-56467 (Dec. 2, 2009) at 2.

The United States Supreme Court subsequently reversed this portion of the judgment of this court. We likewise reverse and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Los Angeles Cnty, Cal. v. Humphries, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. 447, 453-54 (2010).

*The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Central Illinois, Springfield, sitting by designation.