This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Marriage of Hibbard

Husband who became disabled following separation from wife due to post-traumatic stress disorder may not modify spousal support obligation due to prior agreement.





Cite as

2013 DJDAR 1932

Published

Feb. 12, 2013

Filing Date

Feb. 8, 2013


In re the Marriage of

In re the Marriage of

HOWARD L. HIBBARD

and

LYDIA H. HIBBARD.

 

HOWARD L. HIBBARD,

Appellant,

v.

LYDIA H. HIBBARD,

Respondent.

 

No.  A135901

(Alameda County

Super. Ct. No. CH220577)

California Courts of Appeal

First Appellate District

Division Four

Filed February 8, 2013

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

 

BY THE COURT:

 

      The second sentence of the first paragraph under I. Factual and Procedural Background is modified to read as follows:

 

As a result of his service in Vietnam, he has suffered from symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since 1970.

     

The first sentence of the fourth paragraph under I. Factual and Procedural Background is modified to read as follows:

 

On February 10, 2012, Howard filed a motion to terminate spousal support, alleging that in December 2011 he had been diagnosed formally with PTSD, relating to his service in Vietnam, and that he was currently unable to work more than two to three hours per day.

     

The second sentence of the sixth paragraph under I. Factual and Procedural Background is modified to read as follows:

 

From that revenue, he had paid his current wife?s salary and $1,200 per year in continuing education expenses.

     

The modification does not change the appellate judgment.  (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(c)(2).)

      Appellant?s petition for rehearing is denied.

 

                                      __________P.J.

 

 

 

 

 

 

#238483

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424