This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Conn v. Gabbert

Fourteenth Amendment isn't violated when prosecutor executes search warrant on attorney while client is testifying before grand jury.





Cite as

1998 DJDAR 10538

Published

Mar. 11, 1999

Filing Date

Oct. 4, 1998



ORDER

Certiorari Granted CONN, DAVID, ET AL. v. GABBERT, PAUL No. 97-1802 United States Supreme Court Filed October 5, 1998
        The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following questions:
        1. Does a prosecutor violate an attorney's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by causing the attorney to be search at the time his client is testifying before a grand jury?
        2. If the answer to the first question is "yes," was such a right on the part of the attorney clearly established in March, 1994.





#244576

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424