Shareholders can recover damages for fraud when misrepresentations induce forbearance.
Cite as
2000 DJDAR 8618Published
Aug. 30, 2000Filing Date
Aug. 2, 2000
HARVEY GREENFIELD,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
FRITZ COMPANIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
No. A086982
(San Francisco County
Super. Ct. No. 981760)
California Court of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division Four
Filed August 3, 2000
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 28, 2000, be modified as follows:
On page 10*, the third full paragraph, line 5, delete the words "but for the misrepresentations" so that the sentence reads:
There is no change in the judgment.
DATED:
* See Daily Appellate Report of August 1, 2000, page 8356, column 1, line 8, first full paragraph.
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 28, 2000, be modified as follows:
On page 10*, the third full paragraph, line 5, delete the words "but for the misrepresentations" so that the sentence reads:
The core of plaintiff's complaint is that defendants made misrepresentations which induced him to continue holding shares of the corporation that he otherwise would have sold.
There is no change in the judgment.
DATED:
Hanlon, P.J.
* See Daily Appellate Report of August 1, 2000, page 8356, column 1, line 8, first full paragraph.
#250193
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424