Investment groups are not liable for fraudulent conveyance based on exercise of ‘unwinding’ option in contribution agreement where option was clearly documented.
Cite as
2014 DJDAR 9301Published
Jul. 16, 2014Filing Date
Jul. 14, 2014RONALD HASSO,
as Trustee, etc.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
JOHN HAPKE,
Defendant and Appellant;
CHARLES FISH
INVESTMENTS, INC., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents
No. G047495
(Super. Ct. No. 30-2009-00333066)
RONALD HASSO,
as Trustee, etc.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ROCKWATER AMERICAN
MUNICIPAL FUND, LLC, et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
No. G047588
(Super. Ct. No. 30-2009-00333066)
California Courts of Appeal
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three
Filed July 15, 2015
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING PETITION
FOR REHEARING
[CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
Appellant John Hapke has filed a petition for rehearing in which he requests that we modify our opinion filed on June 19, 2014 to direct the trial court to enter judgment in his favor in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 629. We GRANT his request for modification.
The opinion filed in this case on June 19, 2014 is hereby ORDERED modified as follows:
1. On page 60 of the opinion, in the third full paragraph, delete the following sentence: ?The order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is moot.?
2. Substitute the following new sentence in its place: ?The trial court shall enter judgment in his favor.?
This modification changes the judgment.
The petition for rehearing filed on July 3, 2014 is DENIED.
MOORE, J.
WE CONCUR:
O?LEARY, P. J.
RYLAARSDAM, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424