Minor's purported confession is inadmissible because it was product of coercive interrogation warranting reversal of wardship ruling.
Cite as
2015 DJDAR 7155Published
Jun. 24, 2015Filing Date
Jun. 23, 2015In re Elias V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Elias V.,
Defendant and Appellant.
A140263
(Sonoma County
Super. Ct. No. 37612J)
California Courts of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division Two
Filed June 24, 2015
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion certified for publication and filed herein on June 9, 2015, be modified as follows:
1. At page 3, replace the year 2013 with 2012, in the fourth sentence of the last paragraph, to read as follows:
The landlord never told Aurora that Elias?s family asked her
to evict her family, and denied that the eviction, which took place in
November 2012, was retaliation for Aurora?s accusations against
Elias.
2. At page 5, in the first line of the second paragraph, replace the year 2013 with 2012, to read as follows:
After Aurora phoned the police on October 23, 2012, Sonoma
County Deputy Sheriff Carlos Chavez was instructed to look into the
matter and make an ?incident report? that would be used to decide
whether a detective should be assigned to investigate the case.
There is no change in the judgment.
Kline, P.J.
Attorneys for Defendant and Appellant: L. Richard Braucher
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth
Defendant and Appellant: Megan G. Crane and Joshua A. Tepfer
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent: Kamala D. Harris, Gerald A. Engler, Eric D. Share and Sharon G. Birenbaum
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424