This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

ZF Micro Devices v. TAT Capital Partners

Statute of limitations tolling applies to both compulsory and permissive cross-complaints under pre-1971 case law.





Cite as

2016 DJDAR 11842

Published

Dec. 1, 2016

Filing Date

Nov. 29, 2016


ZF MICRO DEVICES, INC. et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

TAT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

 

No. H040776

(Santa Clara County

Super. Ct. No. 109CV134970)

California Courts of Appeal

Sixth Appellate District

Filed November 30, 2016

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

 

NO CHANGE IN THE JUDGMENT

 

THE COURT:

 

     It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 3, 2016, be modified as follows:    

 

1. On page 8, third full paragraph, first sentence, delete ?because of the delayed accrual of the statute of limitations? and replace it with:  ?because the accrual of the claim was delayed due to ZF?s having failed, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, to discover the facts underlying the claim until a date less than four years before the cross-complaint?s filing.?

 

2. On page 12, first full paragraph, fourth sentence, change ?noted? to ?notes?

 

3. On page 17, second full paragraph, third sentence, delete ?because the alleged conduct resulting in harm occurred prior to February 28, 2002, when ZF Devices ceased operations? and replace it with:  ?i.e., on February 28, 2002, when the harm to ZF Devices occurred.?

 

4. On page 17, third full paragraph, fourth sentence, change ?from? to ?of.?

 

5. On page 21, first full paragraph, third sentence, insert ?the? after ?from? and before ?plaintiff.?

 

6. On page 26, first full paragraph, first sentence, change ?redefining? to ?redefined.?

 

7. On page 27, first full paragraph, first sentence, change ?authority? to ?authorities.?

 

8. On page 28, third full paragraph, second sentence, insert ?of? after ?favor? and before ?Putney.?

 

There is no change in the judgment.

 

 

Dated:                                     

 

WALSH, J.*

RUSHING, P.J.

PREMO, J.

 

 

 

Trial Court: Santa Clara County Superior Court

 

Superior Court No.: 109CV134970

 

Trial Judge: The Honorable William J. Monahan

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Appellants ZF MICRO DEVICES, INC. et al.:

Jeffrey A. Berger

BERGER LAW OFFICES

 

Scott J. Spolin

C. Brent Parker

SPOLIN COHEN MAINZER

 

Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents TAT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD., et al.:

Joseph Nicholas Demko

Matthew Scott Kenefick

JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP

 

 

* Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#269240

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424