Navy insulation requirements implicitly requiring use of asbestos-laced product constitute 'reasonably precise specifications' under the government contractor defense.
Cite as
2016 DJDAR 12559Published
Dec. 21, 2016Filing Date
Dec. 20, 2016
GARY KASE et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION,
Defendant and Respondent.
No. A143590
(San Francisco City & County
Super. Ct. No. CGC-11-275958)
California Courts of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division One
Filed December 21, 2016
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND
CERTIFYING OPINION FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on November 22, 2016, was certified for partial publication in the Official Reports. After the court?s review of requests under California Rules of Court, rule 8.1120, and good cause established under rule 8.1105, it is hereby ordered that part II.C. of opinion should be published in the Official Reports.
Dated:
Margulies, P. J.
Trial Court: San Francisco City and County Superior Court
Trial Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson
Counsel:
Brayton Purcell, LLP, Gary L. Brayton and Richard M. Grant for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Dentons US LLP, Lisa Lurline Oberg, Felicia Y. Feng and Andrea J. Casalett; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Thomas M. Peterson and Deborah E. Quick for Defendant and Respondent.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424