This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Mallano v. Chiang

Order


Court

CASC 2DCA/2

Cite as

2018 DJDAR 10199

Published

Oct. 17, 2018

Filing Date

Oct. 15, 2018

Opinion Type

Order


Robert Mallano

v.

John Chiang

 

No. S250379

C.A. 2nd, Div. 2, Nos. B272124; B276842

California Supreme Court

Filed Oct. 15, 2018

 

 

The justices of this court, having determined recusal is appropriate in the present posture of the above-captioned matter, hereby recuse themselves. Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 6, subdivision (e), Code of Civil Procedure, section 170.8, and the established procedure set out in the Internal Operating Practices and Procedures of the California Supreme Court, section IV.J., a subsequent order, to be filed as soon as possible, is contemplated, assigning other judicial officers who first took judicial office on or after July 1, 2017, to adjudicate the pending petition for review. (See Mosk v. Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 480-483; Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 342, 350, fn. 1; Schwarzenegger v. California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District (S189114) [Dec. 21 & 22, 2010, orders recusing and assigning replacement justices].)

#272186

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390