Ruling by
Tracie L. BrownLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Mary E. WissCourt
California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/4Cite as
2019 DJDAR 11118Published
Dec. 2, 2019Filing Date
Nov. 27, 2019Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
ReversedJOYCE CARROLL,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
No. A155208
(San Francisco City & County
Super. Ct. No. CGC-17-562580)
California Courts of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division Four
Filed November 27, 2019
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING;
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 31, 2019, be modified as follows:
On page 11, the last sentence of the second paragraph, beginning, "Questions of retroactivity and remedies, . . . " is changed to:
"Such questions, however, are not before this court, and Long's reference to the continuing violation doctrine is not controlling here."
On page 17, the last sentence of footnote 13, beginning, "Plaintiff thus cannot recover . . . . " is changed to:
"Plaintiff thus cannot bring timely claims for relief under Richards or Alch for violations going back to her retirement in 2000."
The request for clarification is granted and addressed by the above modification.
There is no change in judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390