For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Precision Framing Systems Inc. v. Luzuriaga
Under Civil Code Section 8414(a) if a mechanical lien is filed before the contractor has ceased work, the filing is considered premature and the mechanical lien is void and unenforceable. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/2 Sep. 3, 2019
Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co.
California's common law notice-prejudice rule is a fundamental public policy for the purpose of choice of law analysis; thus, case remanded to determine whether notice-prejudice rule applies. 		Civil Procedure CASC Aug. 30, 2019
Conservatorship of K.P.
Lanterman-Petris-Short Act Section 5352 permits treatment facilities to initiate conservatorship proceedings when admitting an uncooperative patient and is not considered an element for jury instruction. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/2 Aug. 30, 2019
De la Carriere v. Greene
Defendant obtained affirmative relief on cross-complaint and obtained greater relief in the action despite plaintiff's post-judgment success, so defendant was prevailing party for Civil Code Section 1717 fee award purposes. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/8 Aug. 30, 2019
Gilmore v. Lockard
A party need not satisfy good cause or extraordinary circumstances standard provided in 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c)(4) in order to withdraw magistrate judge consent before all parties have consented. 		Civil Procedure 9th Aug. 29, 2019
Marriage of Sahafzadeh-Taeb and Taeb
Trial court's thorough recitation of reasons supporting finding of bad faith constituted an implied finding of bad faith sufficient to support sanctions against appellant's counsel for failure to appear at trial. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/1 Aug. 28, 2019
Bird v. State of Hawaii
Plaintiff's claim was time-barred because she had knowledge of injury giving rise to her claim over two years ago. 		Civil Procedure 9th Aug. 26, 2019
Fidelity National Financial Inc. v. Friedman
28 U.S.C. Section 1963 does not require that a court have personal jurisdiction over a judgment debtor in order to register an existing judgment. 		Civil Procedure 9th Aug. 23, 2019
Hersey v. Vopava
Plaintiff obtained judgment more favorable than defendant's first Section 998 offer, but trial court did not address whether plaintiff was prevailing party with respect to defendant's second Section 998 offer, necessitating remand. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/8 Aug. 16, 2019
O'Brien v. AMBS Diagnostics, LLC
Judgment debtor's 401(k) holding funds transferred from individual retirement accounts was formed to protect funds from creditors, rather than retirement purposes, so they were only partially exempt from levy. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/2 Aug. 12, 2019
Red & White Distribution v. Osteroid Enterprises
Under Civil Code Section 1671(b), a liquidated damages clause will be considered unreasonable and unenforceable if it bears no reasonable relationship to the actual damages. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Aug. 12, 2019
ClipperJet Inc. v. Tyson
Defendant filed untimely notice of removal, co-defendant filed duplicative notice of removal, and defendant failed to take action for eight months after remand, warranting entry of default and default judgment. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/3 Aug. 9, 2019
Patel v. Facebook
Plaintiffs established Article III Standing because the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act protected their concrete privacy interest and alleged violations posed at least material risk of harm to those interests. 		Civil Procedure 9th Aug. 9, 2019
Ehrman v. Cox Communications
Defendant's jurisdictional allegations, which provided a short and plain statement of the parties' citizenships based on information and belief, satisfied its burden of pleading minimal diversity. 		Civil Procedure 9th Aug. 9, 2019
Bakalian v. Central Bank of Turkey
In the absence of invalidated extension statute, plaintiffs' claims were barred by ten-year statute of limitations for claims of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. 		Civil Procedure 9th Aug. 9, 2019
Scott v. City of San Diego
Amended Government Code Section 12965(b) merely clarified, rather than changed, existing law, and applied in this case to warrant reversal of the trial court's cost award. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Aug. 5, 2019
Robles v. Employment Development Dept.
Trial court erred in limiting attorney fees under California's private attorney general statute, to only second phase of litigation because first phase also satisfied the criteria under the statute. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/4 Aug. 2, 2019
Dine Citizens Against Ruining v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
Wholly Navajo Nation-owned corporation shared the Nation's tribal immunity, and dismissal of the action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 19 and 12(b)(7) was not improper. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jul. 30, 2019
Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
Representative plaintiff in class action need not introduce evidence establishing how notice of action will be communicated to individual class members in order to show ascertainable class. 		Civil Procedure CASC Jul. 30, 2019
Bontilao v. Superior Court
Regardless of whether petitioner's motion was directed to trial of a criminal or civil cause, it was untimely under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6(2)'s all purpose rule. 		Civil Procedure 6DCA Jul. 26, 2019
Severson & Werson v. Sephery-Fard
Under Section 527.8 of the Workplace Violence Safety Act, an employer seeking a restraining order for its employees, must provide the respondent with five days notice of the hearing. 		Civil Procedure 6DCA Jul. 26, 2019
Hollingsworth v. Superior Court
The superior court first assumed jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims, so it, not the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, should determine which tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Jul. 26, 2019
Cole v. Hammond
Trial court erred in denying defendants' motion for mandatory dismissal pursuant to Civil Procedure Section 583.360, and instead granting plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Jul. 26, 2019
Modification: Samsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Appellant satisfied requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.420(a) and respondent failed to meet exceptions under Section 2033.420(b), so appellant was entitled to costs of proof under Section 2033.420(a). 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/8 Jul. 25, 2019
Khrapunov v. Prosyankin
Remand was necessary for the district court to conduct additional fact-finding about foreign proceedings to determine if 28 U.S.C. Section 1782's requirements remained satisfied by plaintiff. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jul. 25, 2019
Gemini Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
Contractual forum-selection clauses are unenforceable when enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which the suit is being brought. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jul. 25, 2019
Rodriguez v. City of San Jose
Plaintiff's Second Amendment claim relating to police's seizure of firearms from her residence after her husband was detained for mental health evaluation was barred by issue preclusion. 		Civil Procedure 9th Jul. 24, 2019
Chen v. Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLC
Trial court was not required to revisit choice of law ruling which found Indiana law applied because plaintiffs' settlement with Indiana-based defendant was not such an exceptional circumstance warranting such reexamination. 		Civil Procedure CASC Jul. 23, 2019
Brown v. City of Sacramento
Although plaintiff's suspension was a discrete act, plaintiff's claim based on suspension was timely because suspension only became final within the one-year statute of limitations for filing an administrative complaint. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Jul. 19, 2019
Nodal v. Cal-West Rain, Inc.
Juror's statements during deliberations injected opinions explicitly based on outside information that were contrary to the evidence, instructions, and theories tried and thus, influenced jurors and prejudiced plaintiff. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/6 Jul. 18, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.