For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Menu
  • Sign In
    • Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
    Daily appellate reports
    Sign up for Daily Journal emails
      Filter by date
       to 
      Search by Case Name
      Search by Judge
      Search by Case Number
      Search by DJ Citation Number
      Search by Category
      Search by Court
    Name Category Published
    MACH-1 RSMH, LLC v. Darras
    Despite asserting claim as common law fraudulent transfer, because it met the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act's substantive requirements, it was governed by the Act and required to meet its filing deadline.     		Commercial Law 4DCA/3 Aug. 7, 2024
    Goldstein et al. v. Superior Court (San Diego Guns, LLC)
    The statutory exemption allowing under 21-year-olds to purchase rifles with a valid hunting license does not apply until the license period begins.     		Commercial Law 4DCA/1 Jul. 21, 2023
    Enigma Software Group USA LLC v. Malwarebytes, Inc.
    Computer software company's false advertising lawsuit against its competitor was sustained because the competitor's statements made a specific claim about the software's characteristics.     		Commercial Law 9th Jun. 5, 2023
    GRFCO, Inc. v. Superior Court (Dept. Industrial Relations)
    Contracting companies were properly debarred from acting as public works contractors because they knowingly violated apprenticeship requirements by failing to follow the regulations printed on the apprenticeship forms.     		Commercial Law 4DCA/2 Apr. 5, 2023
    Modification: Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
    Vineyard giving a nonoperational pizza oven to a grocery store for a promotional display did not constitute furnishing a "thing of value" in violation of the Business and Professions Code.     		Commercial Law 3DCA Aug. 25, 2022
    Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
    Vineyard giving a nonoperational pizza oven to a grocery store for a promotional display did not constitute furnishing a "thing of value" in violation of the Business and Professions Code.     		Commercial Law 3DCA Aug. 18, 2022
    Produce Pay Inc. v. Izguerra Produce Inc.
    Where the parties' transactions resembled a consignment, the seller was entitled to Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act protections.     		Commercial Law 9th Jul. 11, 2022
    Kim v. TWA Construction, Inc.
    A contractor is not entitled to compensation for work performed by an unlicensed subcontractor.     		Commercial Law 6DCA May 17, 2022
    Modification: Sky Posters Inc. v. Dept. of Transportation
    Redevelopment displays qualify as an on-premises display exempt from Outdoor Advertising Act requirements if the display advertises businesses in the area and is not merely incidental.     		Commercial Law 2DCA/7 May 13, 2022
    Sky Posters Inc. v. Dept. of Transportation
    Redevelopment displays qualify as an on-premises display exempt from Outdoor Advertising Act requirements if the display advertises businesses in the area and is not merely incidental.     		Commercial Law 2DCA/7 May 12, 2022
    SwiftAir v. Southwest Airlines
    Because inflight entertainment and wireless internet access are services, state law causes of action involving those services are preempted by the federal Airline Deregulation Act.     		Commercial Law 2DCA/7 Apr. 7, 2022
    R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. County of Los Angeles
    Los Angeles County's ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products is not expressly or implied preempted by the Tobacco Control Act since it fits under the Act's savings and preservation clauses.     		Commercial Law 9th Mar. 21, 2022
    Rice v. Downs
    Disgorgement of fees paid pursuant to charging order was not appropriate when the party holding fees had a perfected security interest with higher priority than the judgment holder seeking disgorgement.     		Commercial Law 2DCA/1 Dec. 29, 2021
    Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner
    Trial court's reasoning indicated that it confused false advertising cause of action with fraud cause of action in its commonality analysis for class certification.     		Commercial Law 4DCA/2 Apr. 8, 2021
    Front Line Motor Cars v. Webb
    Section 2982.5 of the Rees-Levering Motor Vehicles Sales and Finance Act allows the sanctioning of dealers who do not intend in good faith to enter into bona fide credit-sales with buyers.     		Commercial Law 4DCA/3 May 14, 2019
    By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.