Stephen M. Duvernay is an attorney at Benbrook Law Group, where he provides litigation and counseling services for matters arising in the constitutional, political, administrative, and public policy arenas. He also serves as Chief Senior Research Fellow at the California Constitution Center at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.
Notre Dame Law School; Notre Dame IN
Columns
Title | Category | Published |
---|---|---|
Supreme Court ruling against ATF's bump stock ban leaves it up to Congress | Administrative/Regulatory, U.S. Supreme Court | Jun. 21, 2024 |
Castellanos shows the futility of petitions for review | California Supreme Court | Apr. 12, 2023 |
Rose Bird was not recalled | Judges and Judiciary | Jul. 20, 2022 |
The secret to SCOCA’s consensus | California Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court | Jun. 20, 2022 |
Your town is not an independent republic | Constitutional Law, Government | Dec. 20, 2021 |
Everyone gets along on the California Supreme Court | California Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court | Feb. 19, 2021 |
Two cooks in California’s policy kitchen | Constitutional Law | Aug. 10, 2020 |
The governor’s emergency powers are just right | Constitutional Law, Government | Mar. 23, 2020 |
Equal Rights Amendment is still in play, if Congress wants it to be | Constitutional Law, Government | Jan. 16, 2020 |
California’s constitution needs some changes | California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law | Oct. 29, 2019 |
Governor Sunshine’s Court | California Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Dec. 31, 2018 |
California needs a lawyer | Constitutional Law, Government | Jun. 22, 2018 |
Leaner bar is good for attorneys and the public | California Supreme Court, Government | Jul. 25, 2017 |
Prop. N doesn't pass muster | Constitutional Law | Nov. 22, 2016 |
Why the rush to dissolve the bar? | State Bar & Bar Associations, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Apr. 14, 2016 |
Justices should review SF gun law | 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court | Mar. 27, 2015 |
Six problems with 'Six Californias' initiative | Constitutional Law | Mar. 12, 2014 |
Verdicts & Settlements
Title | Category | Published |
---|---|---|
Supreme Court ruling against ATF's bump stock ban leaves it up to Congress | Administrative/Regulatory, U.S. Supreme Court | Jun. 21, 2024 |
Castellanos shows the futility of petitions for review | California Supreme Court | Apr. 12, 2023 |
Rose Bird was not recalled | Judges and Judiciary | Jul. 20, 2022 |
The secret to SCOCA’s consensus | California Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court | Jun. 20, 2022 |
Your town is not an independent republic | Constitutional Law, Government | Dec. 20, 2021 |
Everyone gets along on the California Supreme Court | California Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court | Feb. 19, 2021 |
Two cooks in California’s policy kitchen | Constitutional Law | Aug. 10, 2020 |
The governor’s emergency powers are just right | Constitutional Law, Government | Mar. 23, 2020 |
Equal Rights Amendment is still in play, if Congress wants it to be | Constitutional Law, Government | Jan. 16, 2020 |
California’s constitution needs some changes | California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law | Oct. 29, 2019 |
Governor Sunshine’s Court | California Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Dec. 31, 2018 |
California needs a lawyer | Constitutional Law, Government | Jun. 22, 2018 |
Leaner bar is good for attorneys and the public | California Supreme Court, Government | Jul. 25, 2017 |
Prop. N doesn't pass muster | Constitutional Law | Nov. 22, 2016 |
Why the rush to dissolve the bar? | State Bar & Bar Associations, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Apr. 14, 2016 |
Justices should review SF gun law | 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court | Mar. 27, 2015 |
Six problems with 'Six Californias' initiative | Constitutional Law | Mar. 12, 2014 |