This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
National Environmental Policy Act
Highway Bypass Project

Center For Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Willits Environmental Center, Environmental Protection Information Center v. Federal Highway Administration, California Department of Transportation, Malcolm Dougherty, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Published: Jan. 11, 2014 | Result Date: Dec. 19, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12-cv-02172-JSW Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sharon E. Duggan

Aruna M. Prabhala
(Center for Biological Diversity)

Adam Keats
(Center for Food Safety)

Douglas A. Ruley


Defendant

Martha C. Mann
(U.S. Dept. of Justice)

Jason A. Hill

Ardine N. Zazzeron
(California Deparment of Transportation)

Derek S. van Hoften


Facts

The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and others filed suit against the California Dept. of Transportation, alleging that they had failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act in connection with a highway bypass project in Willits. Caltrans considered whether the bypass project should be composed of four lanes or two lanes, and after considering various factors, decided upon four lanes.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
CBD disputed whether the proposed bypass project should be composed of two or four lanes. They alleged that the Corps. violated the Clean Water Act, due to the resulting discharge of materials into designated wetlands and waters of the U.S. as a result of the bypass construction.

Result

The court granted Caltrans's and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' motions for summary judgment, finding that it had evaluated environmental impacts associated with changed project plans, and that its decision to not supplement the Environmental Impact Statement was legally appropriate.


#100213

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390